Finally, I an answer.
Sago worm is forbidden according to the religious dietary law.
There's been an 'informal debate' in the online version of a local newspaper.
I'd categorize them into 3 groups.
Group 1) those who don't eat sago grub and adhere to the religious dietary law.
Group 2) those who eat sago worm but have to adhere to the new amendment to the dietary law.
Group 3) those who eat sago worms and doesn't have any obligations to adhere to the said dietary law.
I have no comment on the first 2 groups but the last one. These people are the one giving me hell sometimes.
They gave such a stupid comments. Well, why does another religious dietary law have to do with you? Why must you give negative comments about other religion's dietary law? Do you have to say that they are stupid for giving up the delicious delicacy?
Why? Why? Why?
I have a strict dietary law too. A 'quasi-kosher' dietary law. Or should I say it's a dietary law which most ignore because it's in the Old Testament? Torah?
I got a lot of negative comment for not eating pork. Until now, I can't eat pork. Initially it's an obligation to my religion's dietary law which eventually become biological. I have allergies to pork, prawns, crabs... Maybe it's the Lords way to make me adhere to the dietary law. I have allergies towards sago grub too...
Sometimes it's logic, why certain religion abstain their followers from eating certain food. Pork is indeed delicious. I'm not that religious, so I've tried some. But one also can get cysticercosis from ingesting
Taenia solium eggs, larvae... Some are not as apparent as pork.
A friend of mine whose family owns a pig farm doesn't eat pork. He has his reason. "They are indeed delicious, but if you see one everyday, you'll get it"
However, the new amendment creates a dilemma to those who eats sago grubs for generations. It's a delicacy. Some accept the new ruling but some say that they could not promise not to eat sago worms. Some also question those who amend the fatwa.
I can't help but imagine what would my mother's friend, her former colleague say. Before the new ruling, sago grubs are considered makhruh but some. She is a fan of sago grubs.
One day, she brought some 'delicacies' to share with her colleagues, including my mother. They were a close knit friends, having their own 'potluck' in the staff-room. Another colleague questioned her choice of food. While makhruh is not forbidden, but it is best for one to abstain from eating/doing one.
Her reply was "Yes, but do you eat crabs? horse-shoe crabs?. Don't they live in 'two worlds'?"
I'm not a religious scholar. But one rule applies in general
EAT AT YOUR OWN DISCRETION...
And those falling the the 3rd category, Please shut up. You should thank us who adhere to strict religious dietary law instead. There's a lot of food for you. Less competitors. And get a life. And don't forget one day the good Lord could reverse everything.
A former classmate of mine was questioning my dietary law. She even asked me to convert to another religion for not eating pork. Now, she's married to a Muslim, convert into one. One day, craving for a Hallal Chinese delicacies, she posted this question in Facebook, "Where can I get Hallal Muslim food in this little city?"
Knowing one particular family selling the said delicacy (sometimes craving for pork-free rice dumplings) I told her there's a Chinese Muslim family, selling cakes in the market. Apparently, that Chinese Muslim is her neighbour. Before this, she don't bother buying cakes from them, now she have too...
So, a moral for those who are quick to judge, never ridicule one's diet. The table could be turned.